Films
in Focus
By
Ed Garea
You
Can’t Cheat An Honest Man (Universal, 1938) –
Directors: George Marshall, Edward F. Cline (uncredited). Writers:
W.C. Fields (story) as (Charles Bogle). George Marion, Jr., Richard
Mack, & Everett Freeman (s/p). Henry Johnson, Lew Lipton, Manuel
Seff, & James Seymour (contributors). Cast: W.C. Fields, Edgar
Bergen, Charlie McCarthy, Eddie “Rochester” Anderson, Mortimer
Snerd, Constance Moore, John Arledge, James Bush, Thurston Hall, Mary
Forbes, Edward Brophy, Arthur Hohl, Princess Baba, & Blacaman.
B&W, 79 minutes.
There’s
an old saying that too many cooks spoil the broth, which is certainly
the case in this film, even though it contains one of W.C. Fields’s
best and funniest performances.
The
plot is vintage Fields. He plays Larson E. Whipsnade, a low rent P.T.
Barnum whose business philosophy is to wheedle every last nickel from
his customers and share as little of it as possible, especially with
his employees and attractions. His “Circus Giganticus” is
constantly in danger of foreclosure, and the sheriff is not too far
behind him.
He
only cares about his daughter Victoria (Moore) and son Phineas
(Arledge). Both are away at college, where Victoria is pursued by
Roger Bel-Goodie (Bush), a shallow, upper-class twit whose family’s
money has gotten him out of scrapes with the law. Roger has proposed
to Victoria, but neither she nor Phineas are excited about marrying
into the Bel-Goodie family
As
the film opens, we see Fields in a frantic attempt to escape the
pursuing law. He makes it to the state line, but we know it will be
just a matter of time before a new set of lawmen chase after him.
Victoria
pays a visit to her father and falls in love with Bergen (playing
himself). But after she sees the financial mess her father is in and
considering how he sacrificed to send her and Phineas to college, she
decides to accept Roger’s proposal. Whipsnade initially approves of
her match, and to make sure the penniless Bergen doesn’t change her
mind, he sends Bergen, Charlie McCarthy, and Mortimer Snerd aloft in
a hot-air balloon, though Bergen and Charlie later manage to
parachute to the ground, landing in Victoria’s car, with all being
arrested by the police. Of course, this being a Fields film, nothing
comes out as planned.
When Whipsnade attends the engagement party (arriving in a horse-drawn chariot), he raises such a ruckus that the snobbish Bel-Goodies have him banished. After being released on bail, Victoria arrives at the party and sees how the Bel-Goodies have treated her father. That’s enough for her and she calls off the engagement. When the sheriff crashes the party to serve papers on Whipsnade, she escapes with her father and brother in a chariot with Bergen and McCarthy in pursuit on a bicycle, while Snerd comments on the chase from the balloon.
When Whipsnade attends the engagement party (arriving in a horse-drawn chariot), he raises such a ruckus that the snobbish Bel-Goodies have him banished. After being released on bail, Victoria arrives at the party and sees how the Bel-Goodies have treated her father. That’s enough for her and she calls off the engagement. When the sheriff crashes the party to serve papers on Whipsnade, she escapes with her father and brother in a chariot with Bergen and McCarthy in pursuit on a bicycle, while Snerd comments on the chase from the balloon.
Fields
is at his sardonic, misanthropic best in this movie. Unfortunately,
he has the baggage of Bergen and his wooden friends, McCarthy and
Snerd. The pairing of Fields with Bergen and McCarthy was a success
on radio, but in a movie, where they could all be seen, the illusion
is shattered. When we see Bergen and Fields interacting with a wooden
dummy we find we can’t suspend our disbelief that much and the film
loses some of its charm.
Another
point about the film is that while Fields has some wonderful scenes
(scamming the customers who are trying to scam him) and lines (“Who
stole the cork from my lunch?”), the Fields presented here is a
different Fields from the lovable misanthrope we’re used to from
such films as The Old Fashioned Way and Poppy. This
Fields has a pronounced unsympathetic streak in him. He bullies for
the sake of bullying and not to conceal his soft-heartedness. He
canes his troupers when they dare to ask for their wages; he flies to
vehement rages on little or no provocation; he throws Charlie
McCarthy to the alligators; and in the scene where he cuts the
tethering rope for Bergen’s balloon, he does so after Bergen and
his pals have pledged their loyalty to him. He’s more the Fields of
radio, the product of nagging and being nagged in return by a
smart-alecky ventriloquist’s dummy.
But
we can’t blame Fields for this turn of events. Look at the credits
and all the writers credited. Universal took the picture away from
Fields and seemingly had it rewritten by committee. Fields
himself would later complain that that the additional writers had
taken his character of Larson E. Whipsnade and made him too
unsympathetic.
It
was bad enough that producer Lester Cowan took the script away from
Fields and assigned it to others, what really rankled the comic was
Cowan deleting one of the key characters: Madame Gorgeous, a
tightrope walker married to Whipsnade and the star attraction of his
Circus Giganticus.
At
the beginning of the film, Madame Gorgeous plunges off the high wire
to her death, which drives Whipsnade into bitter grief expressing
itself in his low estimation of his fellow man. His children are the
only things worth having to him and he acts accordingly. Cowan and
the other stuffed suits at Universal, being wary of their new star
due to the circumstances by which Paramount let him go (alcoholism),
decided that opening a comedy with a death defeated the entire idea
of the picture and simply forced Fields to take the scene out. Look
closely; there are two quick shots of one of the wagons in
Whipsnade’s circus painted with an ad for “Madame Gorgeous” on
the sides.
The
one scene where Fields comes through entirely as himself is at the
engagement party. Passed off by his son as a big game hunter, Fields
proceeds to regale the party with an account of his adventures.
Unfortunately. Madame Bel-Goodie (Forbes) is afraid of snakes –
even to the point where she’ll faint if the word in mentioned.
Fields, of course, is cheerfully oblivious to this, and every time he
mentions the word “snake,” Madame Bel-Goodie goes into a swoon.
Fields attributes it to her drinking and picks up the story where he
left off. The juxtaposition of Fields’s stories and Madame
Bel-Goodie swooning is hilarious, as are his explanations for her
spells.
One
of the downsides of the movie is the racial humor (for which I blame
the studio), from Charlie McCarthy appearing in blackface (the reason
was never made clear) to Eddie Anderson’s clowning as “Cheerful,”
Whipsnade’s dumb and obedient lackey.
And
as if all this wasn’t enough, Fields had trouble with director
George Marshall on the set, a situation that grew so bad that Eddie
Cline, who previously directed Fields in Million Dollar
Legs (1932) had to be brought in to direct Fields while
Marshall handled the rest of the cast. Cline went on to direct Fields
in his last three great films: My Little
Chickadee (1940), The Bank Dick (1940),
and Never Give a Sucker an Even Break (1941), where
at last he was able to sneak Madame Gorgeous into the film.
When
the previews of the film proved unsatisfying with audiences, Fields
was brought back in for retakes, which killed his chances of playing
the Wizard in The Wizard of Oz, a role written
specifically with him in mind, and one that he really wanted to play.
While You
Can’t Cheat an Honest Man has its moments, it doesn’t
have enough of them and it lacks the heart of his earlier efforts.
Great
Dialogue
Whipsnade (to
a group of children standing around at his circus): “You kids
are disgusting… staggering around here all day reeking of popcorn
and lollipops.”
Thank you for that. I found it enlightening, telling me many things I hadn't known, and I can't find a thing in your analysis I disagree with.
ReplyDeleteThank you so much, Robert, for the kind words. They are greatly appreciated. I agree that Ed did an excellent job with his review of this W.C. Fields film.
Delete