TCM
TiVo ALERT
For
April
8–April 14
DAVID’S
BEST BETS:
A
HARD DAY'S NIGHT (April
11, 2:15 pm): If you consider all of the films starring music
bands put together quickly to capitalize on their popularity, you'd
be hard-pressed to find more than a handful that are even mediocre.
This one starring the Beatles is the best of the bunch – by a
lot. The film is a
look at a couple of days in the lives of the Fab Four at
the height of Beatlemania as they run from screaming fans
and prepare for a TV show in which they'll perform. While I'm a huge
Beatles fan, I much prefer their music from 1965 to 1969. However,
the songs in this 1964 film are among the best of the early Beatles'
music, including the title track, "Can't Buy Me Love," and
"I Should Have Known Better." The script is clever and the
four come across as charming and witty, at ease with funny one-liners
and amusing sight gags. They'd try to repeat the magic a year later
with "Help!" The soundtrack is better, but the film is a
silly throwaway piece of fluff more in tune with this genre.
NORTH
BY NORTHWEST (April 14, 9:00 pm): This is one of
Alfred Hitchcock's best films. It features of his main go-to
storylines about a case of mistaken identity involving international
espionage. Hitchcock always got the most out of Cary Grant, and this
is certainly a perfect example. James Mason as the deliciously evil
Phillip Vandamm steals every scene he is in. But that
doesn't mean Grant and Eva Marie Saint are window-dressing. The movie
features two of Hitchcock's most iconic scenes – Grant attacked by
a crop-duster airplane and Grant and Saint climbing down Mount
Rushmore to escape from baddie Martin Landau. This is one
of Hitchcock's finest efforts, which is saying a lot as the master
director's career was filled with the best cinema has to offer.
ED’S
BEST BETS:
THE
KNACK . . . AND HOW TO GET IT (April 8, 10:30 am):
Director Richard Lester scored a big hit with A Hard Day’s
Night in 1964 and everyone wondered how he would follow it.
This was the follow up movie, and it is just as delightful. For
anyone wondering about exactly what “the knack” is, it’s the
“art” of scoring with women. Colin (Michael Crawford) is tired of
having missed out on the sexual revolution, so he enlists his good
friend, skirt-chasing Tolen (Ray Brooks) to teach him the
ropes. Both meet their match, however, in Nancy (Rita Tushingham),
a girl just arrived on the London train, and who, with bags in hand,
is looking for the local YWCA. Tushingham is a marvel in
this film – the perfect representation of an English “bird”
from the mid-‘60s, and she gives the boys much more than they
bargained for when they sized her up. Lester’s direction – the
frequent cutting and fast-paced editing – brought more than a touch
of the French New Wave to the film. It’s almost as if
Jean-Luc Godard had a sense of humor. Lester also employed
an innovative use of the camera while filming outdoor scenes,
capturing the unrehearsed and candid reactions of onlookers and
overdubbing their scenes with a running dialogue, in itself a neat
trick that adds to our appreciation. However, for all Lester’s
pyrotechnics, the real star of the movie behind the scenes is
screenwriter Charles Wood. Lester may have given us pretty postcards
of London, but it’s Wood, who adapted the original successful
Off-Broadway play by Anne Jellico, who captures the essence of
“Swingin’ London” and makes the film a “must see.”
FOOTLIGHT
PARADE (April 11, 12:15 pm): More of the same
from Warner's, only this time it's Jimmy Cagney as a
producer of short musical prologues for movies fighting time and a
rival company’s spies in order to get his product ready.
Joan Blondell steals the movie as Cagney’s lovesick
secretary. With Dick Powell and Ruby Keeler as the eternal
juveniles. Cagney wows us in the finale with Ruby Keeler in
the “Shanghai Lil” number. And is that really John Garfield
in a cameo at the beginning of the number? Meanwhile, try to spot
Dorothy Lamour as an uncredited chorus girl. This was her
screen debut.
WE
DISAGREE ON ... THE UMBRELLAS OF CHERBOURG (April 12, 10:00
am)
ED:
A++. To say this film stands as a unique event in the
history of film – and musicals – is putting it mildly. It is a
grand experiment in which all the words are sung. The score, written
by Michel Legrande, includes not only the famous main theme and
other songs, but also the bridging dialogue between songs in the
style of the lines used in opera to link passages. As with any
experiment, director Jacques Demy was taking a chance: this
would either work or it would fail. When we think about it, the film
could easily sink as a lightweight romantic musical. But it doesn’t.
As time passes the film continues to stand out as a poignant, very
bittersweet look at how true love sometimes doesn’t have a happy
ending. The other remarkable thing about the film is the pastel
colors. Demy used the bright, vibrant colors in an attempt
to mimic the studio-bound artificiality and style of the classic
Hollywood musicals. I must admit when I first saw this film in the
‘80s, I wasn’t that impressed because time had faded the colors.
But Demy had acquired the rights to his film a few years
before his death in 1990. After his death, Agnes Varda, Demy’s widow,
restored the film to its original bright colors, and the difference
is remarkable. I must also confess that the film took me a while to
fully appreciate. I have now seen it at least five times and with
each viewing my appreciation for its style, acting, and direction
increases. Of course, it helps that
Catherine Deneuve and Nino Castelnuovo are
probably the most beautiful couple ever in a musical.
(Danielle Licari dubbed Catherine and Nino was
dubbed by Jose Bartel.) After taking voluminous notes during my
last screening and analyzing those notes, I am now convinced that not
only is this film a masterpiece, but also one of the milestones in
the history of film – and anyone who knows me also knows I do not
make such judgments without a lot of thought in the process. My
revised grade reflects this thought. I also bump up the grade in
anticipation of my partner degrading the film, as he hates the vast
majority of musicals, which in this case is somewhat surprising as it
is a French film and he usually goes bananas over any film from
France. To me, any degrading of this film is tantamount to throwing
paint on a Picasso.
DAVID: C. Please
pass the paint because like a Picasso painting, this film is far from
perfect. Actually, it's mediocre at best. Ed is correct about a few
things though he overstates my disdain of musicals. I don't like a
vast majority of them. There are only some I truly hate – My
Fair Lady and Camelot immediately come to
mind. He is also correct that I have a lot of affection for good
French films. I really wanted to like this movie, but I can't. It's
just not good. Ed found it very bittersweet – and if we're only
discussing the ending I agree. However, overall, the film comes
across as too sentimental and overly cute. In the past few months,
I've watched three films directed by Jacques Demy. The first
was The Young Girls of Rochefort (1967), which
like The Umbrellas of Cherbourg (1964) stars
Catherine Deneuve, has beautiful cinematography, fantastic color
and way too much singing; though unlike Umbrellas the
dialogue is spoken and not sung. I didn't like it. Next was this film
followed by 1972's The Pied Piper with Donovan in
the lead role. I wasn't expecting anything from The Pied
Piper (I only watched it because I'm a huge Donovan
fan), but it's an absolutely brilliant, very dark tale that
involves anti-Semitism, death, a damning indictment of religion with
incest and classism thrown in as well. Hopefully this shows that I
gave Demy a few chances. But The Umbrellas of Cherbourg has
too many flaws for me to give it a grade higher than a C. It's one of
the most predictable films I've seen in a while. Guy Foucher (Nino
Castelnuovo), a 20-year-old mechanic in love with Geneviève Emery
(Deneuve), fears he's going to get drafted into the French military
and be shipped off to Algeria. A few minutes later, he gets a letter
saying he's been drafted and going to fight in the colonial war in
Algeria. The two are heartbroken and have sex for the first time –
she's 17 and helps her mother who runs an umbrella store. I was
guessing she was going to get pregnant, and what do you know, she
gets pregnant. The film becomes bogged down at this point because the
plot is ignored in favor of the endless singing and the look of the
movie. While at war, Guy isn't writing enough letters
to Geneviève and
then it looks like she's the one who is distant. Whatever happens,
she ends up marrying a rich guy her mother approves of and while not
happy, she accepts her new life with the wealthy man. The two raise
the child as if he's the father. Guy returns from the war, with an
obligatory limp, to find out the umbrella store and Geneviève are
gone. He ends up marrying a woman who took care of his ailing aunt
shortly after the elderly woman dies. The saving grace of this film
is the coda that occurs six years later. Guy is still married, has a
son and a gas station. Geneviève and
the daughter Guy never met are back in Cherbourg – she's still
married but her husband is not traveling with them – and they just
happen to stop at his gas station. It's her first time back in the
city in years. They recognize each other, talk and she asks Guy if he
wants to meet his daughter. He declines and the two share a tender
and sad moment before she drives away. The film ends with Guy kissing
his wife and playing with his son in the snow. The ending is well
done. If only the rest of the film had that emotion and clarity, it
would have been significantly better. Also, Remy relies a lot on
bright colors yet we barely see the sharp yellows, blues and reds of
the umbrellas sold at the store. Singing every line comes across as a
gimmick and after a while, an annoyance, particularly during the more
mundane conversations.
This is attracting a lot of comments on Google+. Here are some:
ReplyDeletePeter Gatt
8:21 AM
Have to strongly disagree with David not only is it close to my favourite musical but one of my favourite films of all time
David Skolnick
9:28 AM
You're certainly entitled to have the wrong opinion. :) But seriously, I am curious as to what you love about Umbrellas.
Wade Watson
10:50 AM
I liked the film a lot, mostly because of Catherine Deneuve's amazing performance. Singing a three minute song in public is difficult enough. Effectively singing every line in two hour movie takes talent. I thought she knocked it out of the park. This is the film that made me total Deneuve fan.
David Skolnick
10:54 AM
She sang the lines, but Danielle Licari sang the songs. Licari's voice was dubbed with Deneuve mouthing the songs.
Wade Watson
11:08 AM
Oh, well never mind... Just kidding. I'll love you forever, Cathy. ;)
Morris Caudill
12:46 PM
What I like about that movie is that they are both gorgeous. Deneuve is underrated as an actress. She was great in Repulsion and Belle De Jour as well. The beautiful cinematography in Umbrellas is also a plus.
David Skolnick
1:07 PM
I'm a huge fan of Deneuve. She was incredibly talented, beautiful, and as you wrote +Morris Caudill she is fantastic in Repulsion and Belle De Jour to name two. However, I'm not a fan of her work in the two Demy films. The colors and cinematography are great in Umbrellas. It's just not a movie I enjoy watching. It's not awful. I gave it a C.