TCM
TiVo ALERT
For
May
15–May 22
DAVID’S
BEST BETS:
CONFESSIONS
OF A NAZI SPY (May 16, 6:00 am): What's better than
Edward G. Robinson hunting Nazis? Not much. This 1939 movie from
Warner Brothers was the first anti-Nazi film made by a major
Hollywood studio. It came out a few months before the start of World
War II and it would be more than 2 1/2 years after this film
premiered that the United States would go to war with Germany. In
this film, Eddie G. plays an FBI agent trying to break up a ring of
German-Americans who are loyal to the Nazis and are spying here out
of loyalty to their country of origin. It's based on a series of
articles written by a former G-Man who investigated Nazi spies before
the start of World War II. I wish Eddie G. was in the film more, but
the supporting cast of Nazis, led by George Sanders,
Francis Lederer and Paul Lucas, do a fine job until he
arrives.
THE
STRANGER (May 22, 8:00 pm): To repeat: What's
better than Edward G. Robinson hunting Nazis? How about this 1946
film directed by Orson Welles, who co-stars with Eddie G.? In
this movie, the war is over, but there are escaped Nazis in the
United States. One of them is Welles, a former high-ranking Nazi
who has changed his identity. The war criminal is now a New England
prep school teacher married to Loretta Young, the daughter of a
United States Supreme Court justice. When another German comes to
visit, Welles calmly takes him to the woods and kills him
so that his identity remains a secret. Welles is fantastic
as the ruthless war criminal who'll do anything to protect his
identity and his life. Eddie G. does a masterful job as a Nazi hunter
on Welles' trail. Welles wanted to cast
Agnes Moorehead in Eddie G.'s role. I'm glad that
didn't work out. While not as adventurous as some of the other
films Welles directed, it's an excellent movie with great
action, suspense and drama. It's also the first Hollywood film to
show footage of the victims of Nazi concentration camps - an
incredibly powerful image that stays with the viewer.
ED’S
BEST BETS:
MACBETH (May
15, 12:00 am): In the late ‘40s, burning with desire to make a film
of Macbeth, Orson Welles turned to a most
unlikely choice: Republic Studios. About the best thing one could say
of Republic was that it was the Cadillac of Poverty Row studios,
which wasn’t saying much. But when one is desperate, any port in
the storm will do. And Republic, known for its Gene Autry and
Roy Rogers Westerns, was as anxious to have Welles come
aboard. Herbert Yates, Republic’s owner, had long wanted to move
into the world of “prestige films” and leave his B-movie legacy
behind. Welles would be just the man to kick things off in
that direction. At first, everything went swimmingly: Welles brought
the picture in well under budget, probably because he failed to lure
any big names for the film. No star wanted to take his or her chances
working for the eccentric director - especially at a place like
Republic. (For instance, Welles wanted Vivien Leigh
as Lady Macbeth, but husband Laurence Olivier quickly squashed
that notion.) Yates even held his temper when Welles took
his usual good time in editing the film. The prestige the film would
bring the studio would justify any delays. However, when the film was
previewed in Salt Lake City, Denver, and San Francisco, it was
totally savaged by critics who claimed the director’s use of heavy,
authentic, Scotch accents made the film incomprehensible to American
audiences. Yates recalled the prints and had associate producer
Richard Wilson do a repair job. Wilson redubbed about 65%
of the film and cut about 20 minutes, leaving the film with a running
time of 88 minutes. But word of mouth killed any chance it had in
America and England. It did quite well, though, in non-English
speaking countries, especially France and Germany. Archivists at UCLA
put the original film back together in 1980. Because the film is
quite watchable and because it’s rarely shown on
television (the last time I saw it was on PBS about 25 years ago, I’d
say), it’s a must for the cinephile. It’s a real Essential.
THRONE
OF BLOOD (May 15, 2:00 am): The only thing better
than watching Orson Welles’s Macbeth is to
watch Akira Kurosawa’s Macbeth: Throne
of Blood. Kurosawa is a better director than Welles,
and he had a better cast, led by the great Toshiro Mifune,
for this adaptation set in feudal Japan. Despite the usual
trepidations of those concerned over a Shakespeare play translated
for the Japanese audience, we can tell them to relax. The film is a
masterpiece - Kurosawa is one of the great stylists and the
film is a masterful blend of Noh drama, Shakespeare, and
the American Western. For those who love Shakespeare, tune in and
delight in Kurosawa’s adaptation. For those that have never
seen a Japanese film in its original form, start with this one - it’s
impossible to go wrong. And for those who always wanted to watch it,
but were hesitant to tune in, now’s your chance. Personally, the
film is one of my top favorites. I have it on DVD and watch it every
time it airs on TCM. I have also exposed friends and loved ones
to it as well. It’s just too good to pass by.
WE
DISAGREE ON ... MR. SMITH GOES TO WASHINGTON (May
18, 11:45 am)
ED:
A. This film, considered one of the classics of
American cinema, is one I’m conflicted over. The story, about a
young idealist named to the Senate after his state’s junior senator
dies, and who finds nothing but corruption in the Senate, is a good
idea that, for my taste, was not hashed out fully. The character of
Jefferson Smith is just too “Gee Whiz” at the beginning to be
taken seriously, and his fight against the Senate over his bill a
little too much, especially the ending, where Claude Rains suddenly
grows a conscience and confesses all. But the reason I give it the
grade I do is because of the performances, especially those of Jean
Arthur, Claude Rains, Harry Carey (as the vice-president), Edward
Arnold, and Thomas Mitchell. How Arthur missed out on an Oscar
nomination beats me. Capra does a wonderful job directing
the actors, discouraging any scenery chewing (especially on the part
of Rains) and using cuts to emphasize the full effect of the picture.
Except for that last scene with Rains, he really had it down. As I
said, the performances and the direction were first-rate, if not
exactly the plot.
DAVID:
B-. This is a classic film. But if you look at
it objectively it's the cliched formula Frank Capra used a
few too many times. It's ridiculously corny, preachy, sentimental
with an ending you know is going to happen as soon as Mr. (Jefferson)
Smith, played by James Stewart, goes to Washington. After a senator
from an unnamed Western state dies, the state's political
power-brokers look for a replacement. They eventually decide on Smith
believing him to be a sap they can easily control. He's the
incredibly naive and idealistic head of the state's Boy Rangers
who doesn't realize he's supposed to be a puppet of the political
machine. Of course, he's way out of his element in the Senate, but
eventually wises up thanks to his sassy secretary (Jean Arthur).
Stewart's filibuster scene toward the end of the film followed by
Sen. Joe Paine's (Claude Rains) attempt to commit suicide out of
guilt and his subsequent admission that he was part of the conspiracy
to discredit Smith are almost unbearable to watch. However, I agree
with Ed that the acting is exceptional. I've never seen a film with
Stewart or Arthur that a viewer could criticize either for their
performances, and they've both very good here despite the lines
they're reading and how over-the-top preachy the film is.
For the complete list of films on the TCM TiVo Alert, click here.
For the complete list of films on the TCM TiVo Alert, click here.
No comments:
Post a Comment