TCM TiVo ALERT
For
October
8–October 14
DAVID’S
BEST BETS:
STRANGERS
ON A TRAIN (October 12, 11:30 am):
This is one of Alfred Hitchcock's best films and that is saying a
lot. Robert Walker as the crazed Bruno Anthony is hypnotically
amazing. His character wants his father dead and believes he's
struck a quid pro quo deal with tennis player Guy Haines (Farley
Granger). Walker and Granger were solid actors, but Hitch
brought out the best in them. Also, the plot of this film is
unique and interesting. The two are strangers who meet on a train,
talk about solving their problems, namely Walker's
father and Haines' wife. Walker suggests they kill the other's
problem and no one will be the wiser as they don't know each other.
Haines thinks Walker is kidding until the latter kills the former's
wife and wants Haines to kill Walker's father. The tension and drama
are top-shelf.
A
CLOCKWORK ORANGE (October 14, 12:00 am): My
recommendation of this 1971 dystopian film comes with a caveat –
only watch it once. The film is absolutely brilliant, but it's also
incredibly disturbing and violent. I was blown away the first time I
saw it years ago. I've had several other opportunities to watch it
and simply can't make it through the first 20 minutes. It's on
Netflix so I can watch it anytime I want, but again, I can't get
through it. However, if you've never seen it before, watch it. It's
horrifying in parts, but the story is told so well and the acting is
superb. Alex (Malcolm McDowell) is the leader of the Droogs, a gang
of thugs who get high on drug-laced milk and then terrorize London
with "a little of the old ultraviolence," They brutally
beat up, rape and/or kill arbitrary people for kicks (pun intended).
The scenes are graphic, but some include a bit of entertainment.
You'll never hear the song "Singin' in the Rain" the same
way again. Alex is caught by the authorities and agrees to go through
a process to remove his violent behavior by being repeatedly exposed
to graphically violent scenes. He's then sent out into the world
without the ability to defend himself, and payback is a bitch.
Director Stanley Kubrick points the finger at people and government
for society's violence and its failings. It's very well done, but be
warned again, it's deeply disturbing.
ED’S
BEST BETS:
THE
GENERAL (October 9, 6:00 am): Buster Keaton’s at
his absolute height in this tale of a Confederate engineer whose
train, “The General,” is stolen by Yankee spies. He must get it
back, which leads to a riotous chase through the Southern
countryside. There’s another reason he must get it back - his girl,
Annabelle Lee (Marion Mack), is aboard that train. She believes
Johnnie (Buster) to be a coward because he’s not fighting in the
war, but the authorities turned him down, believing he’ll serve the
war effort better as an engineer. He grabs “The Texas” and begins
chasing his beloved train. Filled with sight gags aplenty, the film
never lets up for a minute. It’s a “must see” for those who
haven’t yet seen it, and a “must see again” for those who have.
A classic no matter how one cuts it.
X
THE UNKNOWN (October 10, 11:45 am): Hammer made some
really good science fiction movies in the 50s and 60s. This one moves
from an absurd premise – intelligent mud from deep in the earth is
looking for energy to feed on and sucks us completely in with an
intelligent script from Jimmy Sangster, intelligent acting from star
Dean Jagger and (especially) Leo McKern, and decent, considering the
budget, special effects. It’s the first of the “blob” movies.
Watch for Anthony Newley and Ian McNaughton as a pair of comic relief
soldiers that later fall victim to the blob. McNaughton went to on
produce Monty Python’s Flying Circus.
WE
DISAGREE ON ... ADAM’S RIB (October 11, 6:00 pm)
ED:
B. Of all the films Tracy and Hepburn collaborated
on, this is one of the better efforts, a cheeky romp written
especially for them by the husband and wife team of Ruth Gordon and
Garson Kanin. Add the smooth direction of George Cukor and some
wonderful performances by the supporting cast, and this case of
married lawyers battling in the courtroom and later at home becomes a
harmless and enjoyable way to spend around two hours. In any film
dealing with the battle of the sexes one must tread carefully to keep
the comedy fresh and funny, which is why Cukor was the perfect choice
to direct. He knows when to proceed and when to take the reins in.
Tracy is magnificent as Adam Bonner, who sees wife Amanda as
perverting the course of justice by using this case as a forum for
women's rights instead of a cut-and-dried case of attempted murder.
It would be easy to cross the mine and present Adam simply as a
misogynist or a curmudgeonly traditionalist. The genius of Gordon and
Kanin was instead to portray Adam as a lawyer who refused to see the
case beyond what it essentially was: a case against vigilantism and
no more. As mentioned earlier, a wonderful supporting cast helps the
film, with David Wayne, Tom Ewell, Jean Hagen, and especially Judy
Holliday (her performance here led to her being signed to play Billie
Dawn in Born Yesterday, which won her the Oscar),
providing performances that only caused the leads, in particular
Hepburn, who needs someone strong to play off, to up the volume, as
it were, instead of simply coasting. It also provides Tracy with one
of the best lines in the history of cinema: “Licorice, mmmm. If
there's anything I'm a sucker for, it's licorice." Is it a great
film? Not really. But is it an enjoyable one? Yes.
DAVID:
C-. Despite some amusing moments and a strong
performance by Judy Holliday as the ditsy wife who is the defendant
in the criminal case at the center of this film, there isn't a lot to
enjoy. As I've written numerous times, Katharine Hepburn is cinema's
most overrated actress. While Spencer Tracy was an extremely talented
actor, he was often dragged down to his former lover's level in the
films they did together. This is no exception. In this "battle
of the sexes" comedy, Adam Bonner (Tracy) is a prosecuting
attorney and his wife, Amanda (Hepburn), is a defense attorney. She
is outraged that a woman (Holliday) was charged with attempting to
murder her two-timing husband, who she shoots but doesn't kill.
Amanda believes that if the roles were reversed a man would not face
a similar charge. She maneuvers to defend the woman pro bono while
Adam prosecutes the case. As Bosley Crowther, in a largely positive
review of the film in late 1949 for The New York
Times, wrote: "To be sure, the plot is a frail one and
the argument is not profound. As a matter of fact, it gets quite
fuzzy and vagrant as the picture goes along. And that is the one
plain weakness of the whole thing: it is but a spoof, and the authors
are forced to wild devices and shallow nonsense to wind it up."
Crowther is too polite. I realize it's supposed to be a comedy, but
Hepburn's acting goes even more over-the-top than usual. That makes
for a rather implausible story and, quite frankly, a film very difficult to
enjoy. The antics Amanda pulls in the courtroom makes a mockery of
feminism. To call it a timeless classic – and while Ed doesn't call
it one, other critics do – is ridiculous as its humor doesn't hold
up well today. I wasn't around in 1949, but I'm sure I wouldn't have
found it funny then either.
Hey guys, as always, thanks for the "Heads Up" of cool upcoming films!
ReplyDeleteIt's our pleasure. We're so glad you like our work!
Delete