Film
in Focus
By
Jonathon Saia
Ishtar (Columbia,
1987) – Director: Elaine May. Writer: Elaine May. Stars: Warren
Beatty, Dustin Hoffman, Isabelle Adjani, Charles Grodin, Jack Weston,
Tess Harper, Carol Kane, Aharon Ipale, Fijad Hageb, David Margulies,
Rose Arrick, Julie Garfield, Christine Rose, Robert V. Girolami &
Abe Kroll. Color, Rated PG-13, 107 minutes.
There
are a small handful of films that enter the pantheon as abject
failures. Some films are considered failures because of their box
office returns, movies whose ballooning budgets could not
compete with its audience's apathy. Some films are considered
failures because critics have chimed in and told us they are bad,
unfunny comedies or unintentionally humorous dramas that test the, at
times, limited perceptions of the journalists who become our
taste-makers. Ishtar is considered both, a film that
has become short-hand for Hollywood excess and vain megalomania. The
Golden Girls even have a joke about how awful it is.
The
story goes that producer and star Warren Beatty backed Elaine
May's newest project – a take on the Bob Hope/Bing Crosby road
pictures – as a thank you for the Oscar nominated work she did on
his film Heaven Can Wait (1978) and her script
doctoring on his opus, Reds (1981). Elaine May, once
known as one half of the brilliant improv duo Nichols and May (with
legend Mike Nichols), had been practically blackballed from Hollywood
after she was fired from her last film, Mikey and
Nicky (1976), for going over budget and six
months over schedule. But Beatty believed that May had never gotten a
fair shake. So he recruited his friend Dustin Hoffman as the
co-lead and the three of them headed to Morocco.
Problems
persisted throughout the shoot, including feuds between May and her
cameraman, Vittorio Storaro (who had worked with her and Beatty
on Reds and later shot Beatty's Dick Tracy)
over the look of the film; feuds between May and Columbia over the
immense amount of footage she was shooting; feuds between May and
Beatty over how she was shooting the footage; and
feuds between May, Beatty, and Hoffman on the cut of the film, which
eventually led all three to have their own editor working on a print.
Bad press began to leak about the troubled production and unlike the
scandal surrounding the making of Cleopatra (1963),
another infamous Hollywood bomb, audience's stayed away
from Ishtar in droves. The $40 million movie ended
up making $12 million and May didn’t direct again for another 29
years.
But
what about the movie itself? Does it deserve the bad mouthing, the
thumb biting, the complete disregard it receives? The answer is no.
Lyle
(Beatty) and Chuck (Hoffman) are two terrible songwriters hoping to
make it big in New York. With nowhere else to turn, their manager
gets them a two-week booking in Ishtar, a mythical country near
Morocco, at a restaurant for American tourists and GIs. While there,
they get caught between a secret CIA operation to keep an
American appointed Emir in power and a revolutionary coup to
overthrow him. Shenanigans ensue as both sides look for a map
that threatens to create a civil war. The boys are pitted against
each other with the CIA trying to kill them for what they know and
the leader of the rebellion (Isabelle Adjani – Beatty's then
girlfriend) using their limited intelligence to her advantage. The
movie ends with the boys and their agent blackmailing the CIA to back
their album and a promotional tour in order to keep quiet. And one of
them gets the girl. The movie doesn't say which, and it really
doesn't matter.
As
you can see, the plot is all over the place and not what one would
call logical. But anyone looking for logic in the film misses the
point. As homage, Ishtar captures the spirit of
the Road to... movies, which relied on the personalities
of Hope and Crosby (and Lamour) to carry the films. While some have
complained that Beatty and Hoffman don't capture the essence of Hope
and Crosby – Beatty is too attractive to be the schmuck (or as Lyle
would say "s-muck") and Hoffman is too ugly to be the
lethario Crosby – I would once again have to say this misses the
point. Ishtar is not trying to remake Road to
Morocco (1940); it is satirizing it. If Beatty were meant to
be Hope, Lyle would be full of zingers and sarcastic asides; if
Hoffman were meant to be Crosby, Chuck would be a lot more assured.
Instead, Lyle and Chuck are two complete losers who seem like
slightly more functional versions of Lloyd and Harry from Dumb
and Dumber (1994) than anyone else. Casting Beatty and
Hoffman against type only furthers the satire and both of them more
than competently fulfill their roles, particularly in the New York
scenes where we see them write and poorly perform their songs in what
feels like real time (the songs were written by Paul Williams).
The
scenes in New York are really where the film shines. May and her cast
hilariously lampoon the shuck and jive of trying to make it in the
city with no talent. Their act is so awful it could be handled by
Broadway Danny Rose. If the film falls apart – and it definitely
stumbles – it is when they go to Africa. It's not that May is
incapable of shooting action sequences, but she definitely is more at
home with the two-person repartee she famously honed with Nichols.
Some
critics have complained that Beatty and Hoffman seem to be winking at
the audience; that they come off as removed from the film in a
negative way. First off, Hoffman is never winking at his audience. He
is too Method for that. But I can see what they mean. The film is
blatantly satirical and at times it seems when all else fails they
are satirizing themselves, but this doesn't mean that they
are "superior" to the material as some critics have
surmised. Does anyone accuse Clooney and Pitt's constant on-camera
tomfoolery as "superiority?" No. I think a lot of critics
had it set in their minds that they were going to hate this film
going into it, knew that the stars and their director were
responsible for the negative press, and looked for ways to put the
blame on Mame.
At
the end of the day, despite the unfortunate legend that surrounds
it, Ishtar entertains. In fact, it reminds me
of a slightly worse version of Spies Like Us (1985),
the really fun espionage comedy with Dan Akyroyd and Chevy Chase as
bumbling government agents sent as decoys for an important Soviet
take down. But Spies Like Us doesn't have Charles
Grodin. Seriously, I need to see everything he has ever done.
No comments:
Post a Comment