TCM
TiVo ALERT
For
December
8–December 14
DAVID’S
BEST BETS:
MY
FAVORITE YEAR (December 11, 10:30 pm): What
makes this such an enjoyable film is the wonderfully charming
screenplay written by Dennis Palumbo, and Peter O'Toole as Allen
Swann, based on Errol Flynn. O'Toole gives one of the funniest and
entertaining over-the-top performances I've ever seen. The lines are
great, but it's O'Toole's delivery that make them memorable. He was
nominated for a Best Leading Actor Oscar for this film, his seventh
nomination and seventh loss. He would later be nominated and lose a
record eight times. The film is based on real people who worked
on Your Show of
Shows, and is funny and
sweet without overdoing it.
BEN-HUR (December
14, 6:00 am): It's nearly four hours long, but it's one of cinema's
most spectacular epics. Charlton Heston is masterful as Judah
Ben-Hur, a Jewish prince who ends up getting in a lot of trouble when
reunited with an old friend, who happens to be a Roman tribune with a
real mean streak. The incredible chariot race is reason enough to
watch Ben-Hur.
It's one of the most exciting scenes you'll ever seen in film. Add to
that, Ben-Hur's time as a galley slave on a Roman boat and the
preparation he does to exact revenge and you have a classic film in
every way possible.
ED’S
BEST BETS:
HITLER’S
CHILDREN (December 8, 5:00 pm): There’s junk, and
there’s junk, but this one is great junk. Bonita
Granville is Anna, a German girl born in America. Tim Holt is Karl.
He’s in love with Anna, but he’s also in the Hitler Youth. Guess
what comes first? Anna, for her part, just doesn’t get the whole
Nazi thing. Given a chance to be a good little Nazi and study at the
University of Berlin, Anna denounces the system and the Fuehrer
instead. It’s one thing to denounce the system, but the Fuehrer?
You can guess what happens to Anna from here, but I will tell you
there’s a great scene where she’s publicly flogged at a
concentration camp. No surprise here, but this film was RKO’s
biggest moneymaker for 1943.
HORSE
FEATHERS (December 11, 2:30 pm): It doesn’t get
much better, or funnier than this, unless one counts Duck
Soup. The only thing in the film funnier than Chico and Harpo
passing themselves off as football players is Groucho as the
president of the university. Add the drop-dead gorgeous Thelma Todd
as the “college widow,” and we have a near perfect comedy. There
are many great scenes in the picture: Groucho’s installment as
college president, the Marxs in the speakeasy, where Groucho
mistakenly recruits Chico and Harpo as “student-athletes,” the
classroom scene, Groucho and Todd in the boat on the lake, and, of
course, the football game. The only glitch in the film is that Zeppo
has practically nothing to do but show up to remind us that there are
four Marx Brothers. Just tune in and be prepared to laugh.
WE
AGREE ON ... DR. JEKYLL
AND MR. HYDE (December 12, 2:30 am)
ED:
A-. MGM takes the familiar story and gives it the high
gloss, big-star treatment, making it into more of a psychological
thriller than a downright horror film. And with the Code fully in
force, the story is missing its overtly sexual undertone, replaced
with a straitlaced Freudian sense of morality. But in doing so the
studio took away the cutting social and psychological implications
that so distinguished the 1931 version. But what saves the film and
makes it so watchable are the performances, especially those of Tracy
and Bergman. One of the drawbacks of the 1931 version was the
out-and-out transformation of Jekyll into a hideous monster. How
could we expect Ivy to even become involved with such a creature?
Tracy accomplishes the transformation with little make-up, relying
instead on facial nuances, making the line between good and evil all
the thinner. Ingrid Bergman turned in one of her best performances as
Ivy. Originally cast as Jekyll’s fiancee, Beatrix, she was tired of
playing the “good girl” roles and begged director Victor Fleming
to let her play Ivy. The result was that Bergman showed herself to be
an actress of great range and she more than held up her end playing
against Tracy. Though it’s not quite the shocker the 1931 version
was, Tracy and Bergman make this version one to catch.
DAVID:
A-. I originally picked this film for a "We
Disagree" argument with the intention of giving it a B-. This
was based on my viewing of the film about two years ago. I came away
largely unimpressed with the film, though I like it better than the
1931 version. I recalled the glitz and gloss – and money – of an
MGM production and the somewhat silly notion that people wouldn't
recognize Dr. Henry Jekyll (Spencer Tracy) as the sadistic Mr. Hyde.
After all, the only difference between the two is Hyde has wild hair,
bad teeth and a slightly different colored skin complexion. Also,
most reviews of the film, past and present, are largely lukewarm to
the movie. Then I watched it again the other night and my opinion
changed. I admit I was wrong. I still don't buy that people couldn't
tell the difference between Jekyll and Hyde. But once I got passed
that flaw, I saw a film that featured incredible performances
particularly by Tracy and Ingrid Bergman as Ivy, Hyde's abused
girlfriend. The film clocks in at about two hours, but seems to fly
by. Its sexual situations were restricted by the Hays Code, but we
still get the picture. And while the violence is largely implied,
it's done exceptionally well. I'm glad I revisited this film rather
than rely on my memory as it's quite good despite not being a
favorite of critics.
For the complete list of films on the TCM TiVo Alert, click here.
For the complete list of films on the TCM TiVo Alert, click here.
I believe that this version is far more psychologically oriented and insidious than the earlier March 1931 treatment. It also contains a far ahead of its time bold and daring depiction of a kind of modern-day co-dependent relationship as Ivy is living with Hyde willingly even though she is the victim of domestic abuse. I'd link to my review, but I should like to ask permission before doing so.
ReplyDelete