A
Guide to the Interesting and Unusual on TCM
By
Ed Garea
As
we all know, TCM is devoting the month of February, along with the
first three days in March, to its annual “31 Days of Oscar”
festival. Like last year, there’s little that’s new this time
around, but the format has again been changed this year. This time
around the format is by nominated category, such as Best Original
Song Winners, Best Cinematography Winner, or Best Supporting Actor.
However, no matter how it’s sliced it still comes down to the same
old tried and true. The shame is that there are so many other
categories that can be explored. Added to the usual mix this year is
an evening of Best Documentary Winners.
And
this gets us to thinking. Why can’t there be other, less heralded,
Oscar winners, such an evening of Best Short Subjects or Best
Animated Films or Shorts? There is a lot that can be mined here, not
just the usual parade of the major categories. The point is, TCM, if
you’re going to stay committed to this festival, how about opening
the sluice gates a little and letting in rarities we don’t normally
see?
February
5: It’s a day and night of Best Documentary nominees and
winners. Of the films being shown, only two are premieres,
unfortunately. Again, there’s so much to be seen, so much to show.
The
day begins at 6:45 am with the acclaimed 1969 French television
documentary, The Sorrow and the
Pity. Marcel Ophuls'
film could not be shown on French screen until 1981 and created a
firestorm because it directly challenges one of the primal myths of
Occupied France: that it was a country of resisters. But Ophuls
doesn’t simply make a case of J’Accuse, his
documentary is a complex and entertaining weave of subjects and
figures in wartime France as he examines the complexities of
survival, resistance, capitulation, and collaboration that defined
Nazi-occupied France during the Second World War.
The
four-hour-plus film, set in and around the provincial town of
Clemont-Ferrand, is divided into two parts. Rather than show his
cards at the beginning, Ophuls unfolds his argument slowly, making
his case for how a citizenry could compromise their values not only
for survival, but also for personal gain. For instance, one of the
nuanced points Ophuls makes is the frequency and extent of the
bourgeois’ collaboration with the Nazis for pecuniary gain or to
retain their status. On the other hand he subtly points out that it
was often the farmers, peasants and working class who displayed the
most patriotism and self-sacrifice during the Occupation.
While
Ophuls educates us, he also entertains us with exhaustive interviews
not just of those who were in the direct line of fire, such as
working-class members of the resistance, but also such well-know
figures as Churchill's Foreign Secretary, Sir Anthony Eden; Helmut
Tausend, a German soldier stationed in France during the war; an
aristocratic French Nazi; a British spy in France who worked
undercover as a transvestite cabaret performer; and entertainer
Maurice Chevalier, defending himself against charges of collaboration
with the Germans.
The
Sorrow and the Pity offers us a look at how a conquered
nation can metamorphose from resistance to compliance through the
use, often subtle, of propaganda and intimidation. To further his
point Ophuls includes such rare films as German newsreels seen only
in conquered territory and the subtly anti-Semitic 1940 German
film, Jew Suss (1940), both of which show that the
Germans, rather than creating a climate of hatred, merely took
advantage of hatreds already there, especially the undercurrent of
anti-Semitism that was a part and parcel of French social life.
This
was the best known film of Ophuls’ career. The only son of famed
director Max Ophuls, Marcel immigrated to America in the ‘40s,
where he attended Hollywood High, Occidental College and the
University of California-Berkeley. The Sorrow and the Pity is
his best known film, although he made another documentary with the
same theme, Hotel Terminus: The Life and Times of Klaus
Barbie (1988). It won an Oscar for best documentary feature.
Another
fascinating documentary is Lionel Rogosin’s 1957 On
the Bowery, a powerful semi-documentary about three
days in the life of railroad worker Ray Salyer, who arrives in the
Bowery for a drunken spree and finds himself rapidly becoming a
denizen as Rogosin ponders the question of whether Salyer can return
to a life of work and sobriety or be condemned to a life of homeless
alcoholism on the Bowery. The film was a milestone in an era where
documentaries were mainly confined to innocuous travelogues or nature
studies. It gives middle America a glimpse in that other world, a
world that exists beneath the sidewalk grates, a world where each day
is a fight for survival. The film follows the inhabitants as they
drink, argue, play dominoes, listen to a sermon at the Bowery mission
and sleep in a flophouse or pitch camp for the night on the
sidewalk.
Rogosin
was one of the pioneers of independent film in America and went on
influence many other independent filmmakers around the world. On
the Bowery was ignored in America. Bosley Crowther denounced
it in The New York Times as “a dismal exposition
to be charging people money to see,” noting that, “Indeed, it is
merely a good montage of good photographs of drunks and bums,
scrutinized and listened to ad nauseam. And we mean ad nauseam!” In
the end he dismisses it as “a temperance lecture on film that makes
no new points.” But the film picked up steam after it received the
Grand Prize for documentary at the Venice Film Festival, a British
Academy Award as Best Documentary Feature and an Academy Award
nomination in the same category.
The TCM essay on the film notes that in 2008 it was chosen for preservation in the U.S. National Film Registry by the Library of Congress as being "culturally, historically or aesthetically significant."
Turning
to the evening, at 8:00 pm Al Gore’s documentary An
Inconvenient Truth (2006) premieres. Supposedly
an expose of the myths and misconceptions that surround global
warming, along with suggestions to prevent it, the film plays fast
and loose with the facts and the audience is left with the conclusion
that the only really inconvenient thing in this documentary is the
truth.
At
9:45 pm, Harvey Fierstein narrates the first-rate documentary about
the career and assassination of San Francisco's first elected openly
gay councilor in The Times of Harvey
Milk (1984). The film deftly combines archival
footage with original interviews featuring Milk's contemporaries, as
filmmaker Rob Epstein captures the spirit of Milk and also the spirit
of time and place: 1970’s San Francisco.
Milk
relocated to San Francisco from New York like other young gay men of
the era, looking for a more tolerant society. He opened a camera shop
on Castro Street in the city's gay district. His interest in
politics, in particular the rights of the LGBT community and small
business owners, slowly grew and led him to seek office on the city's
Board of Supervisors, to which he was elected in 1977. In office, he
sponsored major civil rights legislation and campaigned successfully
against state legislator John Briggs's ballot initiative to ban gay
men, lesbians and their supporters from working in the state's public
schools. However, less than a year into his term, he and San
Francisco Mayor George Moscone were assassinated by former supervisor
Dan White on November 27, 1978. When White was let off with a reduced
sentence months later riots followed in the decision’s wake and a
new term was added to the lexicon of pop culture: The Twinkie
Defense.
At
11:30 pm many baby boomers get the chance to relive their youth with
the airing of Woodstock: The
Director’s Cut (1970). And at 3:30 am, it’s
the Oscar winning anti-Vietnam War documentary, Hearts
and Minds (1974), filmmaker Peter Davis’
examination of America’s involvement in Vietnam. It made its debut
at the 1974 Cannes Film Festival, just a year after the American
withdrawal and mere months before President Richard Nixon resigned
his office.
With
debate over the war still ongoing, Davis’ film added fuel to the
fire, with critics rightly noting that it was one-sided and
anti-American. For instance, the film does not consider the
atrocities inflicted upon American soldiers and Vietnamese citizens
by the Viet Cong. But Davis attempted to deflect the criticism by
stating that it was never his intention to show an objective history
of the war. The film’s title comes from a statement President
Lyndon Johnson used to justify America’s growing escalation of the
war: “The ultimate victory will depend on the hearts and minds of
the people who actually live out there.”
The
TCM essay on the film by Sean Axmaker notes that in 2001 Davis
explained that he went into the film with three questions on his
mind: “Why did we go to Vietnam, what did we do there and what did
the doing in turn do to us? I didn't expect the film to answer those
questions, I expected it to address those questions.”
February
2: In the category of Overlooked Classics comes John Ford’s
1940 drama of a merchant ship's crew as it tries to survive the
loneliness of the sea and the coming of war, The
Long Voyage Home. Nominated for six Academy Awards,
the film features great writing along with deft direction and
outstanding performers from its ensemble cast, including John Wayne
as the idealistic and homesick young Ole Olsen. It’s beautifully
photographed in black-and-white by Gregg Toland, who uses low-key
lighting and deep focus photography to establish the film’s
pessimistic atmosphere. Toland would later display these talents on
1941’s Citizen Kane. This is a film that is often taken
for granted, overlooked when placed aside other Ford classics.
But The Long Voyage Home, although it comes across at
times as stagebound, stands on its own as an effective and
unsentimental portrait of lonely and desperate merchant seamen. Ford
cobbled the film together from four one-act plays by Eugene O’Neill
(The Moon of the Caribbees, In the Zone, Bound
East for Cardiff, and The Long Voyage Home). O’Neill
reportedly called the resulting film his favorite work put to film.
February
8: In
an evening devoted to Best Sound Winners, no film could be more apt
than David Lean’s 1952 The
Sound Barrier,
which is airing at 4:15 am. Ralph Richardson stands out as John
Ridgefield, designer of the Prometheus, a jet plane he hopes will
break the sound barrier. For his test pilot he hires Tony Garthwaite
(Nigel Patrick). But there’s one problem: Ridgefield's daughter,
Susan (Ann Todd), is married to Garthwaite and she worries that Dad’s
designs will get her husband killed. The
Sound Barrier is
a drama that is gripping, engrossing, and believable due to Lean’s
work behind the camera. Even at this late hour it’s a Must See.
February
9: On an evening devoted to Best Costume Design, what could
be more apropos than a film about an ambitious model and her climb to
the top? 1965’s Darling,
airing at 12:45 am, stars Julie Christie in her first starring role
as Diana Scott, a gorgeous model who uses her body to get ahead in a
vain search for personal happiness and fulfillment. Directed by John
Schlesinger, Darling is a trite and badly dated look at
the jet set culture that dominated London in the swinging sixties.
The film is told in flashback as Scott, an Italian princess by
marriage, is being interviewed by a reporter at her Italian villa.
She details her climb as she first dazzles intellectual
journalist Robert Gold (Dirk Bogarde), who promptly leaves his family
to live with her. He introduces her to a more wealthy and social set
and she deserts the intellectual Gold to hook up with the
well-connected public relations executive Miles Brand (Laurence
Harvey). Growing bored with Miles she next takes up with Malcolm
(Roland Curram), a gay photographer who takes her to Italy to film
commercials. There she seduces and marries millionaire Italian
widower, Prince Cesare (Jose-Luis deVillalonga), becoming his trophy
wife. Darling is a prime example of debauchery
attempting to pass for profundity and grows ever more tiresome as
Diana skips from bed to bed. The dialogue is marked by such insights
as Bogarde telling Christie that “Your idea of being fulfilled is
having more than one man in bed at the same time.” Yawn. The only
reason we recommend this is because it rarely surfaces on television
and we love bad movies.
February
12: The evening is devoted to Best Director Winners, and Bob
Fosse is saluted this night for his wonderful musical, Cabaret,
leading off the evening at 8:00. Of all the ‘70s and beyond
musicals it’s our favorite by far and is easily Liza Minnelli’s
best performance (and most likely her most memorable one). Based on
“Sally Bowles,” a short story by Christopher Isherwood (from his
collection Berlin Stories), the movie perfectly captures
the setting and mood of Berlin just before Hitler became chancellor
in 1933. Minnelli is Sally Bowles, a bohemian young dancer who
performs at the Kit Kat Club. Joel Grey, who steals the film, is the
emcee at the club. Michael York plays Brian Roberts, a bisexual
writer (based on Isherwood), who shares his bed with Sally and
Maximilian von Heune (Helmut Griem).
Director Bob Fosse took the Broadway musical on which the film is
based and increased the focus of the film on the Kit Kat Club,
cutting all but one of the musical numbers that took place outside
the club. The number he kept in was the harrowing “Tomorrow Belongs
to Me,” a folk song spontaneously sung by young Nazis at an outdoor
café. I have seen this film numerous times and the scene still sends
a chill down my spine. A point of trivia that’s worth mentioning is
that when the musical opened in London’s West End in 1966, the role
of Sally Bowles was played by Dame Judi Dench. Cabaret was
nominated for 10 Oscars, with Minnelli winning Best Actress and Joel
Grey winning Best Supporting Actor.
February
13: A day of Foreign Language nominees and winners is
highlighted by several films either making their debut or rarely
screened. First up at 8:00 am is Keisuke Kinoshita’s
melodrama, Immortal Love (Eien
no hito, 1961), Set in 1932, Sadako (Hideko Takamine) is a tenant
whose fiancee, Takashi (Kenji Sada), is off to war in China. The
landowner’s son, Heibei (Tatsuya Nakadai), has returned home from
the war as a semi-invalid. He tells Sadako that Takashi was probably
killed in the war. As events progress, he rapes Sadako and she
becomes pregnant as a result. Pressure from Heibei’s father (Kato
Yoshi) on her father forces her to marry him. But she cannot love the
son conceived from the rape. Takashi returns home from the war
unharmed, and marries Tomako (Otawa Nabuko), with whom he has a son.
Things then really get sticky as Sadako and Heibei’s son kills
himself at the age of 17 after learning he was the product of a rape.
Their second born son becomes a communist, and their daughter elopes
with Takashi’s son, helped along by the connivance of Sadako, who
knows Heibei would never give his consent. The film ends in the
present day on an ambiguous note, as Sadako and Heibei are trapped in
a loveless marriage.
At
10:00 comes a repeat showing of Jacques Tati’s 1958 comedy, Mon
Oncle. The film follows the further adventures of
Tati’s Mr. Hulot, the lovable bumble who prefers the simple life as
opposed to the modernization going on about him in Paris. His life
life is in sharp contrast to that of his sister and brother-in-law,
the Arpels (Jean-Pierre Zola and Adrienne Servantie), who live in an
ultramodern, gadget-filled home. Tati supplies the humor with a
continuous flow of sight gags as Mr. Hulot tries to adapt to the
environment of his sister and brother-in-law, who is always trying to
find him a job. Though not as good as Mr. Hulot’s Holiday,
it’s still an easygoing delight, thanks for Tati and Piette Etaix’s
sight gags.
At
2:15 am it’s Black Orpheus from
1959, a sumptuous re-telling of the myth of Orpheus and Eurydice set
in Rio during Brazil’s carnival season to the beat of the Latin
American pop music known as “bossa nova.” A largely
unprofessional cast led by Breno Mello (as Orpheus) and
Pittsburgh dancer Marpessa Dawn (as Eurydice) move seamlessly through
the fantasy world of the Carnival. Though it can’t be strictly
labeled as a musical, it is nonetheless drenched through with music
and dance. Director Marcel Camus makes beautiful use of color, with
the film’s energy becoming infectious, almost exhausting at times.
Highly recommended, even to those who normally shy away from anything
having to do with music or musicals.
No comments:
Post a Comment