TCM
TiVo ALERT
For
May
8–May 14
DAVID’S
BEST BETS:
THE
DEVIL-DOLL (May 11, 5:15 pm): Because
Lionel Barrymore was so wonderful as a curmudgeon in nearly every
role he played, it's somewhat difficult to imagine him playing a
vengeful criminal (wrongfully convicted, of course). His character
in The Devil-Doll escapes
Devil's Island and plots his revenge against those who framed him in
this 1936 film directed by Tod Browning, who co-wrote it. Oh, and he
dresses like an old woman at times – and actually pulls it off.
Barrymore was such a pro that he handles himself exceptionally well
in this horror classic in which he shrinks people to one-sixth their
size. The special effects are impressive for a film this old. Maureen
O'Sullivan is great as his daughter and Rafaela Ottiano is amazing as
his partner in crime who takes evil to a new level.
THE
FORTUNE COOKIE (May
12, 8:00 pm): While they weren't a comedic team, Jack Lemmon and
Walter Matthau made several excellent movies together, including The
Odd Couple, The
Front Page and Grumpy
Old Men. The
Fortune Cookie was
their first film together and is the best and funniest. Lemmon plays
Harry Hinkle, a TV cameraman who gets hurt filming a football game
when he is run over by a player. The injuries are minor, but Hinkle's
brother-in-law, Whiplash Willie Gingrich (played by Matthau), is an
ambulance-chasing lawyer who convinces him to fake a more serious
injury to make money from the insurance company. Billy Wilder directs
this film and he is among a handful of the best comedic directors in
movie history. The plot is nothing new, but the work done by Wilder,
Lemmon and Matthau elevate this film to the level of a classic. It's
a very entertaining, funny movie that probably best highlights the
special chemistry these two extraordinary actors had.
ED’S BEST
BETS:
TARZAN
AND HIS MATE (May 8, 10:00 pm); A case where the
sequel is as good as the original, the film picks up where the last
one left off, with Tarzan and Jane having taken up residence at the
tree house in the jungle. Jane’s jilted finance, Harry Holt (Neil
Hamilton), returns with Martin Arlington (Paul Cavanagh), a greedy
ivory poacher. They attempt to get Tarzan to lead them to the
elephant’s graveyard, but without much success. Holt also intends
to convince Jane to leave the jungle and come back to "civilization"
with him, but she's having too much fun swinging with Tarzan. And
Tarzan, with his guard up, will later oppose Holt’s expedition from
plundering ivory from the sacred elephant burial grounds. While doing
this, he confronts all sorts of process shots of wild animals.
Interestingly, MGM’s famed art director, Cedric Gibbons,
co-directed (with Jack Conway) this action-filled entry, notable
among Pre-Code fans for its sexual candor and obvious lack of
clothing.
SHANGHAI
EXPRESS (May 10, Midnight): Marlene Dietrich is at
her best playing – what else? – a temptress. Dietrich is Shanghai
Lily, a first-class rail passenger aboard the
Shanghai Express fleeing the raging civil war in China. Shanghai Lily
is the notorious "Chinese coaster and white flower of China,”
in other words, a highly-paid courtesan who has lived in China for
the last eight years. Over the years her charms have driven many men,
who became obsessed with her, insane. Also aboard the train is her
old flame, surgeon Captain Donald 'Doc' Harvey (Clive Brook). He’s
a stiff-upper-lipped Englishman rushing to Shanghai to perform an
emergency blood clot operation on the British Governor General. He
left Lily out of jealousy, but still carries the torch. She still
loves him, but that was many men ago. Also aboard the train is
warlord Chang (Warner Oland). When Chang threatens to blind Harvey,
Lily offers herself to Chang to save him. With Anna May Wong in a
delightful turn as Lily’s traveling companion, Hui Fei. The most
striking aspect of the film is the memorable photography by Lee
Garmes, who won the Oscar for his work. Best line: When asked why she
changed her name from Magdalen, she replies that it took more than
one man to change my name to Shanghai Lily.
WE
DISAGREE ON ... GREY GARDENS (May 12, 4:00 am)
ED:
A+. This is the film
that brought the Maysles Brothers to the attention of the American
filmgoing public, and ranks as one of my favorite films. Although
many believe the film was inspired by the famous New York
Magazine portrait of the Beales and Grey Gardens by Gail
Sheehy, the truth is that the Maysles brothers met the Beales after
being hired by Lee Radziwill to make a film about her childhood in
East Hampton, N.Y. She brought them to Grey Gardens, where they met
the Beales. When they suggested to Radziwill that the focus of the
film should be the Beales, she withdrew their funding and confiscated
the film they had shot. Grey Gardens is an amazing
film, thanks to the Beales, a mother and daughter who put the
“eccentric” in eccentricity. The Maysles use their “direct
cinema” system to show us the Beales in all their glory and
squalor, though they take the direct cinema method one step further
by interacting with their hosts, accepting drinks and hors
d’oeuvres. The film is also unusual in that it’s not really
interested in how the Beales came to live in such squalor, despite
their background and social connections. The film is more interested
in bringing us deeper and deeper into the Beales’ world. One critic
noted quite perceptibly that the mansion is like the Overlook Hotel
in The Shining in that it has an almost supernatural
hold over its inhabitants and prohibits them from leaving. In an
ironic way, the Beales are not only confined to their home, but are
confined by their home. In the end we are left with
more questions than answers. Why did the Beales, a pair of shut-ins,
allow the camera to display their madness, their loneliness and a
desperate co-dependent relationship? Why do they constantly talk of
propriety, the way things should and must be done, and yet allow
themselves to be seen in a state of squalor? Does it have something
to do with exhibitionism, with a past where they were the centers of
attention by adoring men? Again these questions are never answered,
but we don’t mind in the least, for once we walk past the front
door and into the mansion, we become besotted with the Beales and
their world. We are both repulsed and hopelessly drawn in, anxiously
awaiting the next argument between the two in a series that almost
seems rehearsed, as if they’re performing for the camera. This is
an amazing and addictive documentary about a time long ago and post
to history. In its bizarreness, it’s almost akin to an explorer
discovering a lost tribe shut off from the rest of the world and
living in a world of its own. That’s what makes this so attractive.
In a 2014 poll of the best documentaries ever made by Sight
and Sound, film critics voted this in a tie for ninth on the
list. Considering the other films on the list, that’s quite an
honor.
DAVID:
B. Ed did
an excellent job of passionately articulating his arguments for why
this is one of his favorite films. I'm a fan of this documentary, as
noted by the solid B grade I gave it, and also believe the Maysles
were excellent filmmakers. I prefer two of the Maysles brothers'
earlier films, Gimme Shelter and Salesman,
to Grey Gardens. But I was still concerned about my grade
after reading Ed's glowing praise of the film. So what did I do? I
watched it again – closely. There is no doubt it's a good film, and
the Maysles brothers had a fascinating style of shooting
documentaries, but there are flaws that made me comfortable with my B
grade. First, the film doesn't properly inform you about "Big
Edie" and her daughter, "Little Edie" Beale so it's
difficult at times to understand what's going on. In a brief scene,
there are a handful of newspaper clippings about the mother and
daughter. The articles let viewers know that they are the aunt and
cousin of Jacqueline Kennedy Onassis, they used to be rich and own
Grey Gardens – a rundown mansion in wealthy East Hampton, N.Y. –
that Onassis and her sister, Lee Radziwill, agreed to restore the
structure after its poor condition attracted the media's attention,
and that the Maysles are doing a documentary on the pair. Despite the
work done at the expense of Onassis and Radziwill, the house is in
terrible disrepair again and the two Beales are suffering from mental
ailments. Big Edie is elderly (80 when the film came out and dead two
years later) and likely senile while Little Edie, a former socialite
and model, is only about 58 years old, but seems much older and is
living in the past having lost touch with reality. She is vain even
though her looks are gone, and is prone to fits of anger. The two of
them talk over each other as the Maysles prompt them to discuss their
lives. They are willing to do so, but it just brings on pain and a
lot of random singing of old songs. The film sometimes is
exploitative as the Maysles know there's several things wrong with
the Beales, but they keep shooting. Little Edie whispers bizarre
conspiracy theories, is resentful of her mother, does a dance with an
American flag, and parades around in skimpy outfits even though she
seems disgusted with her looks, particularly when she steps on a
scale and uses binoculars to see she's 145 pounds. Also, the brothers
just allow the Beales to keep talking even though a lot of what they
say makes no sense. If the idea was to capture two former rich people
living lives of delusion then the goal was achieved. But if the goal
was to keep the viewer engaged and interested, it's a mixed bag.
For the complete list of films on the TCM TiVo Alert, click here.
For the complete list of films on the TCM TiVo Alert, click here.
It is totally exploitive and sad and invasive and cruel. I loathe what the film makers did to these
ReplyDeletepathetic sick women
You are right, it was a cruel act to take advantage of the Beales the way the filmmakers did. But sometimes cruelty producers great art.
ReplyDelete