TCM
TiVo ALERT
For
July
15–July 22
DAVID’S
BEST BETS:
I
LOVE YOU AGAIN (July
16, 8:15 am): Cinema's greatest couple, William Powell and Myrna
Loy, are reunited in this 1940 film with W.S. Van Dyke, who directed
them in the 1934 classic, The
Thin Man.
When you have Powell and Loy working together, the chemistry is
magic. It's a fun film to watch with Powell showing great range,
playing the same character two completely different ways. Before a
head injury that reverts Powell's character back to his old self as a
conman, he promised to take a group of Boy Rangers on trip into the
woods to learn about deer-tracking techniques. He has no idea what to
do so he makes stuff up. He ends up falling into holes, getting
caught in traps and is completely lost. It's Powell's best
physical-comedy role that I've seen. And Myrna, what can you possibly
write to capture her beauty and talent? Well, you could write a lot.
But I'll leave it as she is wonderful and delightful in this movie
with her character evolving with the changes in Powell's character.
CAPTAINS
COURAGEOUS (July 21,
5:45 pm): This 1937 film had the potential to be a disaster.
Spencer Tracy, with a Portuguese accent, saves Freddie Bartholomew, a
spoiled rich boy, who, after being rescued, is stuck on a
fishing schooner. The potential obstacles are buying Tracy's accent
and hoping Bartholomew gives the performance of his life. Amazingly,
both occur in this fantastic film. Tracy won the Oscar for Best
Actor, and would win it again the following year for Boys
Town. Captains Courageous also features the
always-excellent Lionel Barrymore as the ship's captain and solid
performances from a cast that includes John Carradine, Melvyn Douglas
and a young Mickey Rooney. It's a great coming-of-age film, adapted
from English novelist Rudyard Kipling's 1897 book of the same
name.
ED’S
BEST BETS:
FIVE
MILLION YEARS TO EARTH (July
15, 6:00 pm): While their Gothic horrors could oft times be
hit-or-miss affairs, Hammer Studios always managed to hit a home run
with their science-fiction films. And it’s no different here:
Hammer took a BBC serial from the ‘50s called Quartermass
and the Pit, added a little, subtracted a little, but on the
whole remaining faithful to the original story. Hammer and director
Roy Ward Baker capture the intelligence and the mystery of the
original not by throwing special effects at the viewer, but in
telling the story through the characters. What begins as the
discovery of a Nazi bomb in an underground tunnel being dug up for
repairs, soon leads to the finding of ape-like skulls surrounding it,
which leads to the realization that this is not a Nazi weapon, but a
spacecraft not of this Earth, but from Mars, complete with arthropod
corpses stored inside. In the end we are wrestling with the
philosophical issues of history and evolution before reaching a
climax by recalling the Collective Unconscious and, especially, its
archetype of the Devil. And despite all these weighty subjects, the
film is an excellent piece of suspense and terror, supplying some
pretty good jolts along the way.
GUN
CRAZY (July 16, 10:00 pm): Director Joseph H. Lewis’s
ahead-of-its-time noir about two lovers (Peggy Cummins, John Dall)
that go on a crime spree. Low-budget specialists Frank and Maurice
King, whose only caveat to director Lewis was not to go over budget,
produced it. Lewis, as I‘ve noted earlier, was a specialist at
saving a penny, as his career was spent in Poverty Row. It also takes
a load off when one is working from a terrific script from
blacklisted Dalton Trumbo (fronted by Millard Kaufman) and MacKinlay
Kantor, who wrote the original story. While it was just another
low-budget film here in America, over in France it was discovered by
the Cahiers crowd and lionized as one of the great
films from America. Such was its power that directors Truffaut,
Godard, Melville, and Chabrol all stole from it. It's always great
viewing and a Must See.
WE
DISAGREE ON ... WOMAN OF THE YEAR (July 15, 8:00 pm)
ED: A. Dave
will tell you how annoying Katharine Hepburn is, and, frankly, I
agree with his opinion. Look at her films from the '30s for RKO and
you'll see why theater exhibitors labeled her a "Box Office
Poison." Granted, she was in some mighty stinkers back then, but
at the same time, she did nothing to redeem herself, to separate
herself from the material. So for me to give this film such a high
grade will cause some readers to scratch their heads and ask what's
going on. First, the Hepburn that worked for MGM is far different
than the one who toiled for RKO. MGM lightened her by putting her in
quality films and not really allowing her to choose her material in
the early days of her contract. They also gave her quality directors
such as Cukor and George Stevens, who helmed this picture, and, more
importantly, quality writing. And whoever thought of teaming her with
Tracy should have received a lifetime Oscar. Tracy, who in my opinion
was the best actor in Hollywood, was the perfect foil for Hepburn,
even better than Cary Grant (if that's possible). Where she was
flighty, he was laconic, the acting yin to her yang. And no picture
shows off this working dichotomy better than Woman of the
Year. It's the perfect clash of snob vs. slob: Hepburn is a
respected political columnist and Tracy helms the bottom of the
intellectual barrel as a sports reporter. In a way it prefigures The
Odd Couple. Watch this movie and it will become clear that this
is Tracy's movie. His is the dominant character, everything revolves
around him; we see the movie through his eyes and Hepburn is really
no more than a supporting player. That's not only why it works, but
works so well. In fact, it set the pattern for their later movies,
all of which basically followed the template. Yes, Hepburn is not
exactly my cup of tea, nor will she ever be. But that does not mean
that she's not capable of making a good movie.
DAVID:
C+. Yes, it's true. I
consider Katharine Hepburn to be the most overrated actress in the
history of cinema. Why? She usually plays the same character
regardless of the film, and that character is an annoying
self-centered know-it-all. Just because I dislike Hepburn doesn't
mean she's completely worthless. She is great in Keeper of
the Flame with Spencer Tracy, and blows me away in The
Lion in Winter (which happens to be on TCM at noon July 22).
But that's not the Kate we see in this film. Her character is the
same one we've seen her play numerous times. She's a newspaper
political columnist who knows incredible people who have incredible
parties talking about their incredible lives and their incredible
experiences in incredible places. Tracy plays a
rough-around-the-edges sportswriter. Of course they fall in love and
marry, but neither fits in with the other's friends and lifestyle.
After a while, you wonder: why are they together? Tracy's character
realizes it too and leaves her. You can figure out the reconciliation
before they even break up. There's nothing in this film that isn't
predictable. Is it terrible? No. But Tracy wasted his tremendous
acting talent having to carry Hepburn, who delivers an uninspiring
performance. It's the first of nine films the two would do together.
As I mentioned, Keeper of the Flame is the only one
worth seeing.
No comments:
Post a Comment