Mel’s
Cine-Files
By
Melissa Agar
Ender’s
Game (Summit Entertainment, 2013) –
Director: Gavin Hood. Writer: Gavin Hood (s/p). Based on Ender’s
Game, a novel by Orson Scott Card. Cast: Harrison
Ford, Asa Butterfield, Hailee Steinfeld, Abigail Breslin, Ben
Kingsley, Viola Davis, Aramis Knight, Suraj Partha, Khylin Rhambo,
Conor Carroll, & Moises Arias. Color, 114 minutes.
Before
there was Harry, there was Ender.
In
1985, Orson Scott Card published Ender’s Game, the
futuristic tale of a world where children are trained to be warriors
and the young boy who emerges as the “chosen one” who will save
the world from certain destruction. Or something like that. I will
confess that I’ve never read the book despite the fact that several
of my friends in college raved about it and count it amongst their
favorite books (or at least they did in 1991). I can’t attest to
how faithfully the (I’m sure) long-awaited film adaptation is to
the original source, but I can say that the adaptation is a dark,
often cumbersome film that feels bereft of heart and soul.
It
is the future. Fifty years prior to the start of the film, Earth has
survived an intergalactic battle with a race of beings called the
Formics. Since that time, the international military has begun
training bright children to become warriors. Colonel Graff (Ford) has
his eye on young Ender Wiggin (Butterfield), a brilliant but dark boy
whose older siblings have tried to enter the battle program and
failed. Graff believes Ender is the great hope for the human race,
the one who will lead them into battle against the Formics once more
and save humanity from invasion and destruction. When Ender faces a
nasty bully with icy cold determination, Graff has all the proof he
needs and whisks the boy off to the battle academy where Ender begins
proving his mettle and natural ability to lead. He quickly moves
through the ranks from “launchie” to commanding his own squad
before ultimately finding himself on the verge of graduating to
full-blown leader in a pre-emptive strike on the Formics. Will Ender
be able to strike a balance between his compassion and violent
tendencies and be the hope Graff believes him to be?
While
the story is largely engaging, it’s also by now pretty familiar and
formulaic. Its influence on many of the YA novels (and film
adaptations of said novels) that have emerged in the nearly 30 years
since its debut is clear. I found myself more than once having to
remind myself that this wasn’t a Harry Potter rip-off
but an ancestor to The Boy Who Lived. Ender’s
Game, though, suffers at times in comparison to its progeny.
In Harry Potter, we have an engaging but flawed young
protagonist who struggles with the destiny that is dumped on his
shoulders. Ender, however, often comes across as a bit prickly and
lacks vulnerability or the sort of self-doubt that fuels our
investment in this type of protagonist. We spend a lot of time having
others talk about Ender’s potential flaws, but those flaws all seem
to magically become strengths as he faces obstacle after obstacle
with brilliant problem-solving skills. He earns a devoted cadre of
followers, but we get little sense of why these kids, all seemingly
quite talented in their own right, have such faith in Ender other
than the actors read the script that told them Ender is the Chosen
One.
At
times, the script seems to lack focus. I would have appreciated a
little more exposition, a complaint I rarely have in films, but with
the futuristic setting, there were little bits of information dropped
that seemed like they should be significant but were glossed over. I
suspect the book explains some of these things more completely, but
the passing comments that are dropped (such as comments about Ender
being a “forbidden” third child) without further explanation left
me waiting for those comments to gain more significance, only to be
disappointed when it never returns. It all makes the plot feel as if
it’s not fully baked and leaves the audience feeling a bit
alienated.
It’s
unfortunate that the film doesn’t quite come together as well as it
could have since it leaves a talented cast afloat with characters
that lack true complexity. Ford, VDavis, and Kingsley do their best
with characters that at best are underwritten. (Davis, in particular,
has a character that seems to be building toward some significance in
Ender’s journey but disappears just as she seems most needed.)
As
for the younger members of the cast, Breslin as Ender’s sweet older
sister Valentine does the best she can with a role lacking in any
real meat. Stansfield plays Petra, one of Ender’s battalion who
takes him under her wing and helps train him when their arrogant
commander (Arias) refuses. There is a clear and instant connection
between Petra and Ender that we are supposed to sense, but the script
doesn’t allow that enough time to develop. As for Butterfield, he
is a remarkably talented young man. I absolutely adored his work
in Hugo. Here, he is saddled with some pretty trite
dialogue which he delivers with tremendous heart and conviction. He
does his best with a role that is largely wrapped in enigma. He’s
a young actor with a great future. Let’s just hope that future
holds more Hugos and fewer Enders.
Ender’s
Game is
not a terrible film. It’s visually pretty incredible to look at,
and a gifted cast does the best that it can with a hollow script. I
can’t attest as to how many of the film’s flaws stem from the
source material and how much is a weak adaptation, but the film left
me feeling largely detached despite an ending that I suspect was
supposed to make me feel something more than, “huh” at the
end. It’s a noble but ultimately empty effort.
Grade: C+.
From Google+: Thanks for the thoughtful review.
ReplyDeleteThe book was not that good either, for roughly the same reasons you gave in your review. 'The Tales of Alvin Maker' series by Card was more engaging, with better exposition, while I could not even finish the first Ender book.